Part I - Models of Synthetic Telepathy | Part II - Acoustic Signal Modulation | Part III - Working Models
Part IV - Bayesian Stopping Criterion
Part IV: Bayesian Stopping Critireon and the Optimization Thereom
Allen Barker, March 22, 2003
This is the final article in this series on mind control models, methods,
and techniques. I think it is about finished, and there is not much I
have not covered. I hope the articles help people to understand these
issues by providing models, terminology, examples, and language, and that the
articles will help to expose and end the abuses. I also hope they help
victims to heal from the abuses inflicted on them. As a victim of such
harassment myself, I have described some things that have helped me to cope
with and understand the true, hideous state of affairs.
This last article builds on the basic model structure described in the
first article of the series, "Models of Synthetic Telepathy." It also continues some discussion and observations from the second and third
articles in the series, "Surreptitious Acoustic Signal Modulation, Voice
Projection, and Direct Brain Interface;" also, "Working Models.".
For a list of some of the basic abbreviations used in these articles, see "Abbreviations."
Parts of this current article can be read literally or figuratively, but
the torture is completely real as are all the examples. Remember Part II
of my earlier series of articles, "Resisting the Mind Control State," at http://www.datafilter.com/mc/protestResist.html.
If you get angry, focus your anger and don't be goaded into actions you have
not fully considered. Act in awareness, get the right ones, etc.
The first section of this article discusses the optimization theorem and
the Bayesian stopping criterion. Next, there is a section discussing
triggers and general concepts related to triggers. Following that I discuss
some of the social and propaganda aspects of the US mind control system.
There is then a section containing some general comments and a section
containing more of my personal observations of harassment. Finally,
there is an optional postscript on the mixed model for people into that.
The Optimization Theorem
I will start right off by stating what I call
the optimization theorem. What is being optimized with this "theorem" is
your resistance to the torture inflicted, as well as your ability to try to
maintain your life as best as you can. The main context being discussed
here is dealing with torture by voice-to-skull incoming, but the general
principle holds in much wider settings. It also holds for the lower-tech
surveillance-based cointelpro style of harassment, for example.
Optimization Theorem:
It may
seem paradoxical, but the best way to take action is to remain
completely calm. |
This is not the first impulse when subjected to harassment and goading, and
it is hard to do. It does turn out to be the most efficient
response. The best way to slam a fist back at the face of your pig
harasser is to remain completely calm and observe it or ignore it. Work
in the real world to agitate for human rights and expose the abuses. It
is like a greedy algorithm in computer science, versus an optimal
algorithm. The greedy algorithm takes the best move in an immediate
sense but does not look ahead to take the best overall move. The optimal
algorithm will look ahead and not necessarily make the locally most tempting
move. Try to train yourself toward this imperturbability. If you
do get angry, focus your anger, and let it motivate you to something
productive.
Turn off your (internal) moron anticipator. Recall that the moron
anticipator is a thought process that anticipates the likely reaction or
response of a moron to something before you speak it or publish it -- or even
before you think it if your mind is being raped. Don't even
interpret the pigs' incoming babbling as language. If the pigs don't get
language, don't anticipate language. Your moron anticipator is probably
a lot smarter than them, anyway, and just gives them fodder for more
harassment. They'll feed your anticipations right back at you. The
pig incoming is just a machine, or might as well be. My microwave oven
always says, "Enjoy your meal," after I make tea. I can tell it 5000
times that I only made tea, but it will not learn.
Don't imbue the incoming, the intrusions, with any meaning. You've
probably gathered all the data that is worth bothering with on that rape
channel. Don't verbalize mentally unless you are doing it for your own
self and want to. Don't explain unless you are doing it for your own
self. If you are not anticipating a moron raping your private thoughts
you will not be tempted to waste time and even dumb down your own
thinking. (Of course you still need the anticipator for your public
speaking, writing, etc. -- but even there, you don't need to go complete
lowest common denominator or absolute most pathetic spin. You can assume some
level of common sense, at least the 6th grade level of US discourse.)
You know how they operate. Anything a retard thinks will annoy,
distract, anger, or otherwise get a reaction from you they will throw at
you. Anything they think will traumatize you or terrorize you. Any
triggers or anything else they ever see you responding to they'll pick
up, bombard you with, and imitate. For example, I responded on
once with sarcasm and anger when the pig said "don't criticize the
government." They put that in the harassment file and still repeat it
over and over to this day. You might call it "the way of the
jackal." This is true in all models, whether RTIs or an autopig
programmed by Major Mengele's software people and psychological profilers.
They will not respond to reason or argument. They may reflect some
phrases back, "Eliza"-like, to keep you engaged, but soon they reset the
machine and go back to exactly the same things as before. They
will do this on any and every feedback channel (FIP) they can, from
voice-to-skull to the internet. But you know the optimization
theorem. What they hate most is when you ignore them, tune them out, or
drown them out, and when you work regularly in the real world to end their
human rights abuses. This is the most efficient response. You can talk
to a machine all day long, but then you have wasted another of your valuable
days and the machine has burned a few watts of power from the outlet it is
plugged into. My microwave oven says "enjoy your meal" after it finishes
cooking something, but I am not tempted to talk to it. I can try to tell
it I only made tea and did not cook a meal, but it will not learn.
The optimization theorem is not a form of "learned helplessness," even
though victims are put in exactly the sorts of positions where such responses
tend to arise. The victims literally cannot escape from their
tormentors, who truly do abuse victims like an experimenter shocking a dog for
weeks on end to see how long it keeps on jumping. If the victims die, freak
out "psychotically," or commit suicide that is just amusement and data to them
-- perhaps making the experiment a resounding success. But human beings
are not dogs, and have not only fundamental, inalienable human rights but also
the power to reason. The optimization theorem is the result of reasoning about
the true situation, and which variables victims currently can and cannot
control.
Knowing the optimization theorem intellectually is easy. Acting like
you know it is difficult. The pigs use every playground trick ever
invented to goad, taunt, harass, and annoy you. They sink to any level
to attempt to demean and manipulate you. They want to anger
condition you, in addition to trauma conditioning you. Emotionally,
also, it is heavy, oppressive stuff to know that there are other "human
beings" in your own society who not only want to inflict such suffering, but
actually do it to you each day for their gleeful sadistic pleasure.
Inside your "private" home and even inside your mind. They are the
equivalent of Auschwitz guards; it is that level of depravity.
There are many similarities to the Holocaust, but there are also important
differences. Open repression versus secret, covert, deniable
repression. Being driven to suicide vs. shot or gassed and burned.
People controlled in their brains by external pigs versus locked up in
concentration camps. The pigs don't even have to feed and house their
distributed concentration camp victims. I heard one pig in the
background of the incoming say one day -- and I do not know the full context
-- "she does what she's told." In a purely physical concentration camp
at least the victims still have their own private thoughts.
An important difference from a physical concentration camp is that the
"walls" are, to a large extent, psychological ones. At least for now,
victims still have some control over their own minds -- which are the
walls of the camp. It is as if by concentrating and focusing their
attention someone in a concentration camp could dissolve the gates and guard
towers, and perhaps expose a few Nazis also. Not that this is easy at
all, and it in no way shifts the blame to the victims for the hideous
atrocities inflicted on them. There are still physical effects like
Delgado buttons and voice-to-skull transmissions. There are basic
conditioning effects that are "hardwired" into human physiology, and real
physical damage from torture, harassment, and stress. And of course
there is all the low-tech cointelpro stuff that accompanies and intensifies
the other harassment.
Emotionally, there is still that death camp air. You look at people
and you know. You saw groups of them conspiring to drive you to
suicide or make you an empty, controlled, mindless, husk. All while
others stood by doing nothing or even cheering it on. The ignorant and
expedient who know something of what is going on often rationalize that the
victims somehow "deserved it" -- while the true criminals as bad as the worst
on any death row are treated as respectable citizens and live among normal
people. This can lead to a sense of apathy after a while, and disgust
with human nature altogether. These people were fellow countrymen, and
often "friends" and acquaintances -- or even family members. So there is
a strong element of betrayal trauma along with all the rest of it. I
hope the learning curve for some other victims can be cut down to the point
where this does not happen, and they can learn all of this before their lives
and anything they still care about are completely destroyed. I
hope these essays help to take away the elements of surprise and secrecy that
tend to keep the walls in place, and reduce the learning curve for other
victims.
Bayesian Stopping Criterion
Besides remaining completely calm and
working in the real world to expose and end the abuses -- as in the
optimization theorem -- at some point you should start training yourself to
completely ignore the mind control harassment as much as possible. (That
is only the goal, don't feel bad or blame yourself if it is difficult in the
face of all the abuse.) When you are first harassed you typically do not
know what is going on, and so even if you remain calm you still need to study
and observe what is being done to you. You need to know, and don't want
to be manipulated by it. At some point, though, you have gathered enough
data so that you have the picture pretty clearly. A million examples, no
counterexamples, call it a rule and be done with it. Measurements and
observations have a cost associated with them. In Bayesian analysis this
is known as the Bayesian stopping criterion. It is based on the concept
usually referred to as diminishing returns.
Below are some sample internal dialogs. They are meant to illustrate
the points and provide examples, rather than to tell anyone how they should
think. People have their own thought styles in their free minds.
Don't be afraid to think anything, even if it is something that tends to set
off a pig barrage. If they get one little wedge in there they'll try to
open it wider. Don't cede one millimeter of your free mind and free
thought.
This first internal dialog is an earlier one, before the stopping criterion
was reached. Imagine RTIs and autopigs babbling their gibberish and
trying to play psyop mind games in between each sentence. This would be
stretched out over some time period or would be a period of intense torture
incoming. Between this you would try to have your normal mentation, as
normal as possible under the circumstances.
shut up, pig. did that fool anyone? how about
that one? pig babbling gibberish. we all know how they
operate. did that fool anyone? what's the Cameron number on that
one? shut up, pig. PBG. that's an autopig of one variable,
simple syntax transformation. that damn machine. it's a machine,
with a few RTIs. shut up pig. that's 30,000 times conditioning
that crap. that was an SCP triggered by a bad parse.
list-reading monkey. that was one trick pig trying to feed back my
anticipation. that's timid boy, trying to induce anxiety.
trigger abbreviation. my entourage of simulated borderline
retards.
Below is a sample script of some more current
internal dialog. In it you don't care what they even tried to say, or
whether it was an autopig or an RTI. Again, imagine a pig trying to say
something, the usual garbage, between each sentence. Each sentence cuts
off a pig or even anticipates it before it spews its garbage.
kill it. that one too. and that one. kill
that one. I don't care what it tried to say. kill it. cut
their pig throats. I don't care. kill that one. I don't
care what model, and I don't care how it happens. kill that one.
kill it. it doesn't matter what kind of lies and BS come out of their
pig snouts. cut that one's throat. kill that one. kill
that one too. no exceptions. it doesn't even get language, it
just gets its pig throat cut. kill it. kill it. kill that
one. bad parse, kill it anyway for trying to say something, that's
even better. kill that one. kill it. kill it. fake
ambient, kill that one. kill it. first metaphorically, then
literally. kill it. find it, make it dead. kill it.
what is that one's name and home address? that's all, kill it. I
don't care how it happens. I don't care what model. I don't care
what it tried to say. cut that pig's pink pig throat. track that
one. lock on. fire. I don't care, pig. find that pig
and kill it; that's all that one ever hears. I know how the machine
operates.
It doesn't matter if they're RTIs or autopigs in
this script, internally. All incoming gets cut off with the same
thing. You do not bother after the stopping criterion to even sort them
into RTIs vs. autopigs. In that sense it is model independent. If
it is an autopig rather than an RTI then kill it means kill the machine
operator and anyone else involved in the real world, and metaphorically any
influence it has in your brain. Train yourself to just cut them
off. It works literally and metaphorically, internally and externally,
for RTIs and autopigs, and for all models. It is so model-independent it
is scary.
In addition to the usual autopig babble, there are also certain phrases
that tend to be stereotypically repeated after you "respond" to one of their
primary phrases. Some examples: "took you a long time to see that," "are
you sure" (a timid boy variant), "that helped you" (operant conditioning
positive reinforcement), "made you respond." These occur just as mechanically
as the primary phrases, and typically because they saw you respond even once,
or you once let the phrase slip by as a "legitimate" incoming. Kill
these ones too; don't imbue them with any meaning either. They are just
there to keep you listening -- they've never sent a 6-digit protocol
confirmation either.
Alternate the above "kill it" training with periods where you completely
ignore them, and "say" nothing to them in your internal dialog. This is
the goal, but sometimes you need to train in the "kill it" mode and shift into
that, especially if you have heavy incoming. If you have to do that all
day it is better than listening to one rapist pig babbling. I call a
temporary shift to "kill that pig" mode "taking a coffee break." If you
find yourself tempted to respond, or distracted, go back to the above and
train yourself some more to cut the pigs off and, most importantly, don't even
consider what they try to say. It is not even language, it is a
nonconsensual cattle prod to the "ugly spot" on your brain where that incoming
arrives.
Nature and source, and sensation. Optimization theorem. When
you are completely calm and their crap does not affect you at all their BS
just hangs in the air, sticking out like a sore thumb. It does not even
get meaning. It then tends to fade out and wait for another chance when
the jackals think you are vulnerable or need to be punished for a
thoughtcrime. At some level you are aware of it even as you ignore it,
because you don't want to be subliminally manipulated, but it is off
encapsulated in some distant zone that has no effect on you.
Any time you want to switch modes to completely ignoring them, invoke IFT
to clear out all the previous mental crap. Come into the present: Poof,
you're there. If you notice you're thinking thoughts that are
unproductive or that you don't want to be thinking (like being influenced by
externals), invoke IFT, poof them out of existence, and come back to the
present. Switch to "kill it" mode if necessary. (Or whatever works
for you; that works for me.) "This is my free mind, and I can think
anything I want right now. What do I want to be thinking?"
Pattern recognition is a beautiful field of study. But I mean really,
just with common sense, how many repetitions does it take before you see the
pattern? If you see it, how long does it take you to act like you know
it? Do 10,000 repetitions suffice? 20,000? More? When
you see how they do it it is not that complicated, just vicious and
jackal-like. At that point it is nothing but Chinese water torture. A
dripping faucet forced to the brain can inflict the same torture: drip, drip,
... drip. When they want to punish a "thoughtcrime" they intensify the
goading, and similarly when they want to degrade your performance in working
on something, etc. This is the "rheostatic capability" of the torture
device as a variable aversive stimulus and performance-degrading weapon.
Don't worry about a false reflection -- or any reflection of your private
thoughts off of a thought-rapist, for that matter. By NPT you do not
care about a rapist Nazi pig's opinions. If you are on a baboon safari
in the midst of baboons, you do not care what they are hooting at you unless
you are studying baboon hoots. You can still gather data, but at some
point that should become almost automatic and calmly detached. After a
few years of mind control torture there is not much that can surprise
you. Disgust you, disappoint you, anger you still, but not surprise you.
Kill the pigs. First metaphorically, then literally (though if you
can do it literally first it will save you and probably a lot of other people
some trouble). If they are 70 years old 40 years from now, kill
them. Wiesenthal on those Nazi pigs. I don't care what model and I
don't care how it happens. (Barring some actual justice in the meantime
where the pig is sent to a humane prison cell.) I mean that quite
seriously, with whatever influence I have in whatever sense. I don't
even have a "need to know" how it happens for those purposes (though I do have
a "need to know" what all has been done to my body, mind, and health).
These pigs torture people to death for entertainment, and they will keep doing
it until someone slits their damn throats or locks them up. That is a
sad fact, but not liking it does not change it. How many more people are
going to be tortured if they are not stopped?
Is the FBI going to "visit" me for calling for literally killing some
sadistic torturers it insists "do not exist"? Who use torture implements
it claims do not exist (but which it knows do)? For calling for some
action to do what should have been their job of ending domestic torture
and arresting the torturers? Even if the torturers work for the
government -- or especially if they work for the government -- the FBI is one
agency that should have taken care of this a long time ago.
If it isn't a six-digit numeric, kill it -- and even then it's your
discretion. The sadist pigs torture for entertainment. They try to
destroy people's minds and drive them to suicide. It is a repeated and
ongoing conspiracy of torture and attempted murder. Kill them.
First metaphorically, then literally. Get the right ones, though, and
don't be misdirected by their psyops. Kill them. You don't care
what they tried to say. The very fact that the pig nonconsensually and
intentionally intruded on your free mind: kill them. But do it on your
own schedule and the way you choose to optimize -- don't be goaded or taunted
into actions. Optimization may not even involve you literally
killing them, but rather working to facilitate that or otherwise stop them;
remember Part II. In any model, they've weaponized nonconsensual access
to people's minds, trying to turn citizens' minds, accessed against their
will, into battlegrounds.
In the usual sorts of spin that one might anticipate being used against
this essay, people might insinuate that this is somehow against my
religion. But I do not belong to any religion which tolerates its people
-- or any people -- being tortured or made into slaves. Some might spin
that I am hypocritical because I am "advocating the same things the pigs
do." But I am not. Don't torture them, kill them humanely.
I'd prefer they end up in humane prison cells, but for the time being the
routes to that sort of justice are being obstructed. There is also a
false symmetry implied between torturing, slaver-like exploiters and those who
would help the victims. Between people committing vicious crimes and
those who would use necessary means to stop them.
For victims it is purely self-defense, because it is clear the pigs are
trying to murder them every day and will not stop unless forced to. Some
people may misapply or misconstrue what I am saying here, but I cannot worry
about how every moron might misunderstand or misapply (purposely or not) the
things I write. We are talking about literal, ongoing, protracted
torture and the sadist torturers committing these acts. And we're
talking about justice.
There are sadistic pigs in this world who try to torture me to death and
inflict any sort of psychological damage they can. That is just the way
it is right now -- my not liking it does not change it. It is
understandable to feel some sadness for the pitiful pigs and wonder why
they are so sadistic, vicious, and stupid. But it is a waste of time --
and that is for the RTIs, never mind the machine APs. They'll play off
of even the emotions of pity and contempt, jackal-like. Don't be fooled by the
clown suits and never Stockholm syndrome on the torturing pigs.
Even the obsolete Model 100 autopig is still Chinese water torture, dripping
from a high-tech faucet. Kill the pigs responsible, metaphorically and
literally.
We all know now how they operate, so no one will be surprised. They
won't stop unless they are made to. They may back off a bit if the heat
is turned up, but soon enough they'll be right back to it. They'll even keep
using the exact same triggers on me that I have written about here and
described to everyone. It is similar to a scene in the movie "Jackass"
where the practical jokers are annoying a golfer by sounding a loud sound
every time he gets ready to hit the ball. They keep doing it until he
gets so mad he decides to drive a ball straight at them. When he gets
ready to hit the ball at them and draws the club back they set off the sound
again. That is the sort of harassment, the level of the big superpower's
domestic political control torture techniques. Except it is inside
people's minds, 24 hours a day. In their homes. Destroying their
lives. And the harassers cower in their hiding places far away
inflicting the harassment. Instilling the triggers to be passed along to
those who can use them to repress deniably while acting like the blood is not
on their hands, too.
Triggers and Related Concepts
A trigger is some verbal phrase or sound
(or image, etc.) which has special significance to a victim. It is a
stimulus that has been selected or conditioned to cause a response in the
victim. Very often it is a linguistic stimulus. Classical
conditioning is often blatantly carried out to condition a victim to associate
trigger words with trauma. I have had hateful-sounding RTIs spend hours
in torture sessions trying to condition me like Pavlov conditioned dogs --
except with the desired response being trauma.
To get an idea of how triggers work by an extremely un-subtle but close
analogy, imagine the following. Consider a Paraguayan detention center
of a few decades back, with brute torturers using direct violence, electric
shocks to the genitals, cattle prods, etc. (and perhaps a CIA "adviser"
looking on). Now suppose a victim in this detention center is undergoing
a torture session. Each time the torturer zaps the victim with a cattle
prod he shouts out "beautiful pleasure sensations." He does this over
and over. Now suppose the victim survives and somehow escapes. The
victim is still in a society set up to deny that the torture center down the
road even exists. If the victim starts to speak out she may open up the
controlled newspaper the next day and read a story alluding to her and
repeating the phrase "beautiful pleasure sensations" a few times. People
may walk up behind her on the street and mutter "beautiful pleasure
sensations." If she responds with outrage and anger she is ridiculed.
Most people do not know the situation of why that innocuous-sounding phrase
would make her respond like that, and they may be so naive as to think
torturers would never do that to conceal their vicious crimes.
Much of the whole current mind control system in the US is based around
triggers. Once a trigger is instilled, that is only the beginning of
it. Note that a trigger is not necessarily a strongly conditioned phrase
(SCP) but strongly conditioned phrases tend to be triggers. For example,
they may trigger you with some words meant to remind you of a traumatic
situation they observed or caused and have it work the first time. If
so, they'll tend to repeat it over and over, resulting in a trigger that is
also a "psychic driving" SCP. Here are a few other trigger-related concepts:
trigger reinforcement -- This is where the trauma associated with a
trigger is induced by the trigger and then tends to further reinforce the
trauma conditioning. It is a vicious cycle: Trigger, trauma, further
association of the trigger to the trauma, trigger again, etc. (If you
anticipate a trigger they also tend to quickly send that trigger to reinforce
your anticipation.) If they think they see you experiencing any
strong negative emotions like fear, trauma, or doubt, they'll jump in with a
trigger to both reinforce the trigger's negative associations and to intensify
your pain and distress.
trigger abbreviation -- This is where a trigger is shortened to just
one small part of the original trigger phrase. For example, it may just
be the first word of the trigger phrase with its characteristic
inflections. Other abbreviations are possible, in the general sense of
associative keying of triggers. SCPs tend only to need a hint of a key
presented to evoke the full trigger and concomitant response -- and before
long the abbreviation works as well as the trigger itself. SCPs leave strong
"attractors" in the space of brain flow, as a form of brain damage. Even
just the characteristic rhythm pattern of an SCP will tend to evoke the
phrase. Random events also tend to evoke SCPs, a fact which acts as a
"torture multiplier."
trigger speedup -- This is where the trigger phrase is speeded
up. It is very similar to trigger abbreviation, and still tends to evoke
the response. They presumably hope to "slip it by" your conscious
awareness of what is going on.
trigger transfer -- This is where a secondary trigger is conditioned
to the conditioned response of a primary trigger by pairing them. It can
also occur in a slow evolution of a phrase like children's sing-song taunts
slowly morphing into other phrases and nicknames but keeping the same meaning.
trigger export -- Once a trigger has been instilled in a victim,
anyone can use it. It will tend to set off a trauma response or other
unpleasant reaction in the victim. So the direct torture squads instill
and induce triggers in victims and then pass trigger lists on to higher-level
operatives. These agents can then use the triggers against the victims
without "getting their hands dirty." After a few layers of trigger
transfer, the resulting trigger will seem innocuous to someone who does not
know the torture conditioning that has gone into it. That is part of why
they purposely use trigger transfer. These "innocuous" (i.e. deniable)
triggers may be worked into propaganda, internet messages, or street theater,
for example. This turns out to be a very common control technique for
suppressing mind control victims in the US, and it is obvious once you see
what they are doing. This may be part of why they seem to prefer
linguistic triggers.
A common source for triggers is surveillance of a person's home or
mind. Certain codewords tend to appear on a FIP alluding, for example,
to what the victim did the night before in "private." If the victim
responds, such codewords may be treated as triggers and further
conditioned. By the way, once you know you are under conspicuous
surveillance they will then start to insinuate that they know some other
things from the surveillance, such as that your spouse is cheating on
you. That typically is not true, but has the obvious intention of trying
to destroy the victim's family and personal relationships.
Much of such conditioning is blatant anger conditioning: Those conducting
the surveillance want to taunt the victim with their power to violate the
victim's privacy and induce anger. There was a court case a few years
back where a reputed mobster was placed under surveillance. Those
conducting the surveillance would follow him on the street and repeat things
to him like what his partner said during sex. The obvious intention was
to demean and anger him. He actually won a lawsuit to curb the
harassment, unlike the many ordinary citizens subjected to similar and even
more egregious abuses. Yes, they would do that, they have done that, and
they still do that.
Another common thing is for codewords to imply some sort of terror,
extortion, or blackmail threat: to reveal something those conducting the
surveillance think you will fear having revealed, to do something they think
you fear might happen, even to harm people. With the threat to
embarrass, for example, they typically don't actually reveal their raped
information except perhaps in whispering campaigns or insinuations. What
they really care about is the threat and the potential to manipulate
the person with the threat -- as well as their important goal of maintaining
deniability.
Many victims report intense bouts of cointelpro-style harassment when they
first come under assault. The other sorts of mind assaults often
accompany the cointelpro attacks or are gradually added. Then for many
victims the cointelpro-style low-tech harassment subsides to a lower-level
background while the other mind control assaults, voice-to-skull, etc.,
continue. I have long suspected that this is quite purposeful. The
idea being to first massively traumatize the victims and induce PTSD and other
torture sequelae in order to make them more susceptible to the mind control
harassment. Hyper-alertness and rational paranoia can accompany such
torture, for example. ("They really are out to get you.")
This might "prime" the victims to be more sensitive to the more subtle
tortures and psyops that they otherwise would not notice as readily.
Conditioning introduces a bias in the lower-level sensory data
processing. This is the hardwired, Pavlovian sort of layer:
anticipating, responding. The higher levels have to be aware of this
(consciously one might say) and take it into account. To train oneself
take such biases into account and hopefully uncondition the responses -- or at
least understand that's all they are. This holds in all situations, but
is purposely aggravated for the purpose of torture and manipulation in the
case of conditioning with psychic driving SCPs.
Sometimes Major Mengele comes up with some phrase that he is just sure will
cause trauma -- presumably by studying the transcripts of your torture
sessions and applying his psych training. He then gives this information
to the RTIs and the autopig programmers. The phrase is then repeated
over and over, even if it doesn't actually work. They are so hopeful
about some phrases that they just keep repeating them, presumably because they
think they should work. For example, after they finally destroyed
my marriage and my wife decided she could not live with a mind control torture
victim and activist any longer, they started repeating, "you're impossible to
live with," over and over and over. The intention was obvious: Taunting
that they ripped my wife away from me and hoping to tap into the trauma of
that separation. It was so transparent to me what they were doing and
what they intended that it did not work, but they kept repeating it.
They'll also chant over and over other phrases like "you can't have no kids"
to try to anger me based on their family-destroying abuse -- literally, that
is what they do.
The pigs try to induce new anxieties and exploit any existing anxieties you
might have. They want to always stay cowered in their bunker but inflict
the maximum psychological trauma on their victims. If they think you are
worried about microwaves (or will become worried about it), a favorite
autopig phrase to send at you is "we're microwaving your whole family."
Literally, they sent that one over and over. To me it has almost become
symbolic of how they will sink to any depths to induce trauma in their
victims, by saying anything, as long as they can stay hidden in their
bunker. How many victims were there who got traumatized and terrorized
with that, when there was no microwave and only a vicious psyop? How
many got hospitalized or driven to suicide? Not that I would entirely
rule out the microwaves or any other of the new technologies being developed
and tested, but typically they'll lie about even that so you think it is
something else. Even if you think they are testing such technologies on
you, panic only makes things worse. It is horrible but you almost have
to come to the point where you just shrug and observe, say, your heart beat
irregularly a few beats. Are they going to murder me this time?
They've already killed me over and over. The optimization theorem
applies here, too.
Victims, Society, and Propaganda
The suicide inducement squads attack
you with third-grade taunting machines, in secret. They subject you to
torture inside your home. They sleep-deprive you. This goes on for
years. Then if you write the truth in the appropriate language for the
crimes against humanity being committed, they'll criticize you for not writing
some dry academic tome. If everything I say is the case -- and it is --
how should I respond, react, or write? The academic tome might
let me play at some sort of externally bestowed "respectability" that I
frankly don't need to worry about, but it would also be placed on a shelf with
other academic tomes to gather dust and no action. When I try to write a
math paper or write computer code I get increased harassment directed at my
brain. So what is the priority, the most important thing to work
on? How should atrocity sound from someone under torture?
When I also know that they torture many other people in the same way they
torture me?
When they insinuate that a torture victim should be "diplomatic" they
really mean you should shut up or at least become easier to ignore. How
diplomatic is their goddamn third-grade taunting machine? I call them
pig filthy Nazi pieces of human garbage because that is what they are.
They torture people to death for entertainment, profit, and political
control. They want to portray themselves as all clean and dainty, while
they have paid their thugs to drag their victims through the pigsty. How
"diplomatic" was Frederick Douglass when he excoriated the abominable US
institution of slavery?
The pigs seem to think if they can pick some citizen, harass and torture
them, and install various trauma-conditioned triggers, then they get to "keep"
them as slaves. If the victim speaks out, the pigs spew trauma triggers
and psychic driving triggers intended, presumably, to re-traumatize the victim
into silence. A curious thing is how in the larger context the
conspirators seem to use the same codewords and triggers almost as a symbolic
language or a "currency" among themselves. There do seem to be different
political factions even among the conspirators. Maybe they're trying to
reinforce their conspiracy, rallying sadists. Spreading triggers.
Perhaps they are trying to intimidate any co-conspirators who might develop a
conscience. Who knows.
The victim, seeing this, may be tempted to be dismayed at just how
widespread the conspiracy is -- though be sure to calibrate relative to a
"normal" background as discussed in "Mental Firewalls." The actual smear
against the victim is really nothing, just as Mengele cannot truly discredit
or impugn the morals of a victim he dissected and exploited. Often you
need to stop and think: Anyone who knows what the trigger is at all, in the
first place, almost surely knows that too. "But wait, if they knew that,
they'd know that too" exposes many of the fallacies of the harassers. If
they know about the codeword triggers and the conditioning then they also know
it is a vicious human rights abuse. We basically have a conspiracy of
secret slavers trying to hold on to the free citizens they have
abducted and treated as their property. They have experimented on,
harassed, manipulated, exploited, and profited from these human beings.
The whole coded load of crap is their way of trying to maintain their secret
atrocities, their crimes against humanity.
They'll "rate" you as if your attempts to end ongoing torture and human
rights atrocities are some sort of entertainment. They'll torture you
24-hours-a-day for years and then, if this performance-degrading weapon works
at all, they'll play at being critics of your "performance" -- treating the
torture as if it didn't exist, of course. This includes your private
life in your home as some sort of "performance" for voyeur/spectators, not
just your public work. They view every action you make in living your
life and trying to succeed and accomplish something as if it were only part of
their sordid "game" that they dragged you into. The want to keep their
victims suppressed and keep them from positions where they will have a voice
or any real influence -- all because the victim got dragged into the torture
in the first place and it is self-perpetuating. They don't want their
victims who resist to succeed at any endeavor -- though they don't mind
exploiting them and stealing from them anything they can. If you speak
that truth, even after they've harassed and tortured you for years, they'll
sneer that you're just making excuses.
Where you would think any ordinary person would long ago have stopped
beating a dead horse, propagandists just keep on going with the same tired
triggers and insinuations. Perhaps they figure with their greater
distribution power they can repeat something over and over to make it "more
true" (when it was all BS to begin with). Perhaps they do not want to
change the triggers because they have invested so much effort in trying to get
their audience to pick them up from the repeated subtext. And invested
hundreds of thousands of Cameron repetitions to condition the victims.
But as above, those who know what it means also likely know how phony it
is. So what is it really saying? Is it like some "Heil Hitler"
declaration of allegiance to the Gestapo? Is that the true meaning?
The pigs exploit your desperation. You are under torture. You
are rightfully desperate. The "bad Nazi" is harassing you. So the
"good Nazi" has an opportunity. The "good Nazi" keeps promising to help
you. As a torture victim, you tend to keep paying attention to the "good
Nazi," because there is no alternative. In the "real" world no one even
knows (or admits to knowing) what is going on. You are under an
intolerable torture. The "good Nazi" exploits this. The "good
Nazi" can even turn "bad Nazi" from time to time and the victim will stay
tuned in, because that seems to be the only hope. The "good Nazi" will
promise help and anything else, as long as it is only between the lines or
otherwise deniable. The "good Nazi" can appear on any FIP, for example
as another voice on the nonconsensual voice-to-skull send. Or it might
be a collaborator on a normally legitimate channel -- pigs at a Mockingbird
newspaper, for example. But if you buy the bait they dangle to a desperate
human being under torture, they then start trying to manipulate you.
Whoops! If only you hadn't done that! Well, your freedom was all
lined up if you hadn't done that! Your basic human rights will be
restored soon, if only you will...
Why would anyone listen to some pig voices in their head once they know
they are externally induced? Except to track down those harassing pigs
and kill them? It is more than obvious that they are not "friendlies,"
that they are quite intentionally violating people's minds without consent,
and that they try to inflict harm. They may be Russians for all you
know. It is far more likely they are other Americans -- but that is
hardly any better. People get furiously angry if you cut them off for a
parking place, but somehow when strange voices invade their brain and either
harass them or try to direct them they act like it is nothing... People
tell their children not to talk to strangers, but then these pigs invade their
little heads, too. And people either think this is somehow normal or are
afraid to talk about it. (And Americans have the nerve to taunt the
French as "surrender monkeys," etc.)
It takes a nation of millions of idiots to produce the third-grade taunting
machine. "Puritanical" prudes who practice sadistic, voyeuristic, serial
rape in secret. And people dumb enough, duped enough, intimidated and
cowardly enough, complicitous enough, or just plain evil enough to do nothing
as the big superpower third-grade taunts its "free" adult citizens. The
pathetic clown suit does not hide the vicious psychological manipulation and
Chinese water torture of citizens in their homes and minds. Their rape
violations are not really about sex, though they are obsessed with it; the
violations are about power and trying to demean people and strip away their
dignity. This is the "secret weapon" with which the big superpower tortures
its own citizens.
General Comments
These days, in thinking, I tend to have a habit of
considering certain conclusions across different models. Are there
model-dependent assumptions there, or does it hold in all models? If it
passes a quick test for model independence, I say to myself, "put a star by
that." That assumes the "usual" set of models which I run things
against. Recall that a model independent conclusion or decision does not
depend on the assumptions of any one particular model, so is stronger in that
sense than a model dependent conclusion. You can put more faith in it
and act like you know it, without worrying that you'll have to backtrack if
you change models (even hypothetically, in conditional evaluations).
A slightly weaker condition than model-independent (or model-neutral) is
"model-interpretable." Model interpretable means that you have to
interpret the situation slightly differently in the different models, but
subject to that common-sense level of interpretation it holds in all
models. An even weaker condition I call "metaphor-interpretable." For
some situations metaphor-interpretable is good enough; for others you want
model-independent or model-neutral.
The thoughtcrime known as applied logic. There is no such thing as a
thoughtcrime. Only some fascist who wants to dictate what and how people
are allowed to think.
New named RTI/AP: "one trick pig" rapes your anticipation, bad parses, or
pre-verbal and feeds that back at you -- usually in a pure syntactic
rearrangement. Don't let "one trick pig" unnerve you. This pig (or
algorithm) is similar to people who try to anticipate and finish your
sentences for you, except it is on an illegitimate rape channel and has pure
evil intentions. It typically doesn't even understand what it
rapes. It hopes to grab something from your own thinking and reasoning
process that it can incorporate into a trigger which will get a reaction from
you. Or else to reinforce your anticipation of existing triggers
(trigger reinforcement). In this way they try to turn your own fears,
anxieties, and anticipations against you, to create new triggers for their
trigger file. They are feeding pieces of your own thoughts back at you.
I can just see the PowerPoint slide shows the Mengele-pigs give in secret
Nazi meetings, describing their nonconsensual human experimentation on the
domestic population. The "brave warfighters" hiding in bunkers are
helping to keep us "free" by torturing helpless domestic citizens so they can
study:
- stress responses
- decisionmaking under stress
- "anomalous phenomena"
- behavior control
- neural prosthesis and thought cloning
- conditioning and verbal triggering
- linguistic behavior modification
- covert hypnotic suggestion
- sleep suggestibility and dream modification
- sleep deprivation
- electromagnetic bioeffects
- stimulus-response measurement and modeling
- behavior modeling and prediction
- fake paranormal deception operations
- etc.
I'm sure they give a completely different PowerPoint
presentation full of lies to the legislators and other officials who pretend
to have oversight powers on such activities. If they even bother to tell
them at all. They may just not mention it, or claim it is too secret for
Congress (except perhaps for their lapdogs there). They similarly keep
the truth from anyone in any other branch of government or position of
oversight or funding with any sense of decency and responsibility. In
reality, they are running a treasonous covert political control operation in
the domestic United States that surpasses in reality even Orwell's
imagination.
[A pathetic spinner would try to distract from the main point here and
create divide-and-conquer rifts by insinuating that I am smearing Microsoft by
mentioning PowerPointŪ. Or maybe I typed a bad word a few sections back
in describing torture, and that is supposed to distract from the literal
atrocities being described. They literally brought obscenity charges
against papers which reported the My Lai massacre in Vietnam.]
Here's a practical, low-tech countermeasure against audio harassment to
try. It is working on the symptoms rather than the cause, but I have
found it to be helpful. It has its own appeal for those with an ear for
music:
- get a CD changer with 5 (or more) slots
- get some CDs from artists you trust with your mind
- set the player up for repeat play, random or sequential, as per your
tastes
- keep it on as background, and tune in to it when you feel distracted by
the other crap
- change out the CDs when you feel like it
No commercials, no
announcers, and so no worries about any harassment hidden there. No
surprise songs. Just good music (presumably, by the fact that you
selected it).
This will hopefully provide some level of relief, at least while you try to
heal from the injuries of previous assaults -- along with the ongoing
assaults. The harassers don't want victims to even be able to relax;
they want to keep the sparrows flying until they die from exhaustion.
One wants to be able to ignore the Stasi-like pigs' harassment, and it is
unfortunate that you cannot just enjoy the sounds of quiet in a "free"
country, but don't be masochistic. They try to shove people into
second-class citizen status with constant harassment inside their homes.
When subjected to this you need time to heal, and music can be healing as well
as helping to mask the torture signal.
Further Empirical Observations of Their Methods
In the previous
articles of the series I described some of my own observations of the sorts of
technologies and techniques they have used on me. Here I present some
further observations and analysis.
In further observing the audio harassment, I think the "cricket algorithm"
illustrates a general method they use. Recall that in this harassment
they speak some harassing phrase, syllable by syllable, with each syllable
triggering off of a cricket chirp. "Your mas tur ba shun tech nik...,"
for example, with each syllable following right after a cricket chirp.
(To use one of their favorite pathetic third-grade taunts as an example.
Yes, they really do that to adults in their homes in the US. Pure water
torture.) This exact same thing occurs when listening to recorded
cricket sounds, and changes with each playing. They've tried to
synchronize it to fool me into thinking it is on the tape, but they cannot
deal with random starting places on the tape and tend to start the phrase from
the beginning regardless of where the tape is. The same algorithm also
tends to be applied to the pinging sounds that certain trucks make when
backing up, for example.
On further observation, that also seems to be how they synchronize the
voice send with things like the refrigerator. It seems as if they first
localize some roughly periodic part of the signal and filter out the
rest. They then threshold that signal and trigger syllables off the
peaks (rising edges, for example). Another technique, for basic "hum"
signals, seems to involve first localizing the frequency band of the
hum. They then take the RTI or autopig audio and limit it to that same
frequency band. They then send this frequency-limited signal
voice-to-skull. Sometimes the frequency-limiting is quite blatant.
The same "voices" and phrases tend to occur on all the different frequency
bands, as well as on the cricket algorithm.
I'm still not sure how they give the illusion of directionality to the
signal. It may be some property of the ear or auditory cortex that they
are exploiting. Another possibility I've considered is that they may be
using a Fourier series sound representation but using one of the ambient
frequencies as a fundamental harmonic component. I still do not rule out
that some of the harassment may be actual modulation of the
ambient. They could easily be using several techniques. I also
suspect that sometimes they may modulate the power line only to increase the
hum, rattle, and periodic components of things like appliance noise -- which
they then overlay with the voice-to-skull cricket algorithm or the
frequency-limited hum algorithm. This would give them more bandwidth in
which to hide their "subliminal" signals -- or at least with which to
misdirect those victims who consciously noticed as to the signal's true
source.
Another observation I have made is that during times of strong, obvious
incoming there is often a noticeable scalp sensation. (It is not
obviously there all the time when there is incoming, though.) Whether it
is cause or effect or something else, I do not know. Maybe it is some
communication transmission passing through the scalp in one direction or the
other, or some other side effect. Maybe it results from the part of my
motor cortex controlling the scalp being influenced. Maybe the scalp
manipulation is even the primary effect, and over time has been trained
into language recognition. Or maybe it is just some random effect which
has become conditioned to the torture, like a certain tension that accompanies
the recognition of torture. Etc. One way to test this would be to
somehow completely anesthetize the scalp, deadening all muscle reactions,
etc., and see if there is any lessening of the incoming. (This assumes
they don't have a secondary, backup channel on which to deliver voice, and
assuming the scalp effect actually does have anything to do with it.)
I'm curious if other victims have noticed a similar thing.
The old (obsolete) Model 100 Autopig, with its Third-Grade Taunting
module. They still use that thing, though. Same scripts and all,
just like they tortured me with all last summer. Like you booted up an
old TRS80 from 1980 and ran the same old software. Same old lists of
triggers and crap. Same old scripts. Fake ambient distractions
that get set off to try to thought control you out of some line of
thinking. Same old simple syntax-level transforms on the trigger list
and the raped thought-data. Autopig phrases of 0 and 1 variables. It's
clear also that the machines cannot deal with metaphor or irony -- they don't
really "understand," they just respond like a state machine. There also
seems to be something like a nearest-neighbor algorithm to find the
"nearest-trigger" or "nearest SCP" to what you are thinking about. I can
just view it from a distance now, since it is so pitiful and they've repeated
everything 100,000 times. It would be laughable except that it is a
serious, serious human rights violation.
Different voice models on text-to-voice, and a text file full of trigger
strings. And a simple genetic algorithm syntax generator in the trigger
search algorithm. The "fitness" function of this genetic algorithm is to
maximize a trauma measure in the torture victim. Bits and pieces of the
syntax and the limited vocabulary in the trigger and autopig data file are
randomly recombined to form new sentences. They also mix in words and
phrases taken from your own subvocalized thoughts and anticipations.
Strings are plugged into the autopig phrases of one variable. Mostly the
result is stupid crap that only annoys you because of the repetitive violation
and the transparent intention. They hope that once in a while the random
search will find a new, improved trigger for them to use to control and
manipulate you. If so, they add it right to the file. Blackboard
systems. Production systems.
If it is not a machine or machine-aided, how many full-time idiots does it
take to harass a single citizen under severe harassment? Who is paying
their salaries? All day and all night. The same "voices,"
largely. Repeating the same dumb phrases over and over, with some simple
syntactic transformations and limited vocabulary. A five-year-old has a
larger vocabulary than all of them put together. That is not the way
real people think in their minds, even idiots. If it is not a machine
they are probably more conditioned with that crap aimed at me than I am.
Likewise for any "audience" in an audience model forced to "hear" the same
psychic driving and triggering crap.
One phenomenon I have noticed about the harassment is that it is very
attention-driven. I do not know enough about the attention mechanisms of
the brain to speculate on how this happens (and I don't expect open science
does either). But the harassment tends to occur when you pay attention
to something, or when you anticipate the harassment from past
experiences. It is sort of a "think of the devil" phenomenon. If I
hear a particular sound and focus my attention on it then about a second later
they'll often start to voice-modulate it. But don't be afraid to think
anything, even if you suspect it will set off a third-grade taunting. If
you are afraid to think anything because of harassment you are
definitely not free. If you fear thinking one thing, they'll leverage
that into two things, then four things, etc.
The harassment is not all attention-driven. Sometimes it is
attention-distracting. When thinking of one thing you notice them
blatantly start the voice modulation on a noise source you were not paying
attention to before -- or even sending voice-to-skull in the plain. It
is like they want to get your attention, to distract you, and to get you to
start listening to their abusive manipulation audio. This often tends to
happen when thinking political thoughts the pigs may consider "thoughtcrimes,"
or when making a breakthrough in something like a math proof. And
sometimes just when the jackals think they can annoy you or want to aversively
condition (punish) some behavior or thought.
Optional Postscript: Mixed Model
As in several of the earlier articles
I will end with an optional section on the mixed model, for people into
that. The usual caveats apply, that I do not think this is the actual
model but discuss it for the reasons given in previous articles.
Many people do believe this model is the true one, for whatever
reasons. Some do not know, however, that the pure natural model is
obsolete. The harassers try to exploit this as a psyop. I know
that the harassment I undergo is technology. It is not that I am "just
sensitive" and thus subject to "psychic harassment." But I see certain
propaganda trying to insinuate that this is all just "sensitive people stuff."
Even if that were the case, it would still be torture. People are
purposely inflicting torture on other people, in any model. The
machine-like jackals purposely intend to cause trauma, and suicide if they
can. It is a torture algorithm whether or not it is literally
carried out by a machine. If it were "real psychics" doing it, someone
would have to pay them to do it, because they do it all day long and all
night, day after day. The same boring, repetitive, harassing phrases as
if read off a list. It sure doesn't sound like someone "thinking."
Often synchronized with the natural sounds in the victim's environment,
and remaining the same even when the victim drives hundreds of miles
away. That does not sound like a natural psychic. I do not think
my refrigerator is psychic. But even if it were, it would still be
torture and those pigs would still need to be tracked down by whatever means.
But suppose the mixed model holds, and that there is some natural psychic
component in addition to the technological techniques. In this
case, then, there must also be a huge conspiracy of silence about such
abilities if they are anything more than just very vague intuitions or
occasional sensations. That is, if such abilities come anywhere near the
blatant, constant things mind control victims report experiencing. If
so, then this conspiracy of silence has been turned back against the
conspirators with technology. If you can't talk about telepathy --
sending or receiving -- then you can't complain when someone points a
voice-to-skull device at you and starts harassing you with it. If you do
not know the technology exists, you may not even understand what is really
being done to you in the first place. How convenient.
In such a society, anyone with the covert mind control technology can
torture and harass with impunity, by hiding behind the psychic conspiracy and
mimicking psychic phenomena. Curiously, this works whether psychic
powers exist or not, in any population of people who believe they exist
and believe they can't talk about them. The psyop agents on the
voice-to-skull would be quick to reinforce this belief if they thought a
victim were susceptible to it. That, and the victim would tend to be
scoffed at and dismissed, and would have any lawsuits tossed out of
court. [Of course if the mixed model really does hold in any significant
way then many concepts of mental illness need to be seriously
reexamined. If we hypothetically assume certain facts then we also have
to consider the logical consequences of those facts. If the mixed model
does hold in a significant way then psychiatry has been abused as a cover for
both cointelpro-style harassment and for maintaining a "psychic
conspiracy."]
Let's don't be naive: There are plenty of people in society who would just
love to have this power and would use it with no qualms whatsoever. Look
at how many vile people use date rape drugs, for example. Mind control
experiments go way back, as do harassment operations and techniques. If
they can plausibly deny they are doing it, they will tend to do it, however
unethical, immoral, or criminal. If non-negligible natural psychic
powers really exist, you can bet the CIA, NSA, DIA, former-KGB, and various
other agencies have known about them for years. Such people also tend
not to believe in magic. They have a lot of money available, and plenty
of amoral, unethical scientists. First the secret science lab would
figure out the physics and the biology of how it happens. These findings
would then be sent to the secret engineering labs, where engineers and
technicians would build machines based on the reverse-engineering of the
biological effect.
Remember also that if such natural powers exist they constitute a potential
information path of communication and influence. Some people, on hearing
this, immediately think political control. They do not want any such
channel to exist if they cannot control it. Thus they would want to
dominate it, and suppress any psychics whose thoughts or ideas they did not
like. I have called this "psychic cointelpro," carried out by "psychic
suppression units." One could presumably suppress a psychic with just
ordinary harassment, as well as with high-tech methods. Being able to
control such a person might be even more prized. (And who might
benefit, politically or otherwise, if psychics were beaming out terror and
trauma instead of living ordinary lives?)
If there is a conspiracy to keep true psychic powers secret, then, it has
long outlived whatever purpose it might once have had. It has in fact
become a danger to the conspirators themselves -- who have had it turned back
against them. Those who might now maintain such a conspiracy maintain
one that can be used to control them, as well as others in
society. If a natural psychic responded to another natural psychic, for
example, the technological jackals would observe and measure that. They
would then start imitating ("spoofing") the signal like a mockingbird to try
to manipulate things. Do the "true psychics" really benefit from their
powers, anyway? Or is it just some feeling of being in a secret club, a
sort of supremacy for people without much else? The kind that makes for
some of the most virulent racists? Something to consider in the
hypothetical, if unlikely, case that the mixed model holds.
The pure natural model is definitely obsolete, if it ever held. The
standard model exists now. It seems like everyone has a cell phone now,
and networks like the internet span the globe. In the near future your
daughter's earrings will be always-on cellphones and her necklace will pick up
her silent vocalizations like an artificial larynx. That is just one
possible embodiment of consensual synthetic telepathy, with open,
commercial technology. They are currently marketing soda machines that
can send directed ultrasonic sound to passersby. Neurophones, implants,
modulated microwaves, advanced sensors, the list of technologies goes on and
on. The secret sector already has technology well beyond this, which can
be applied nonconsensually.
Now that technology has started to move into the frontier of the human
brain and mind it is vital that we as members of a supposedly civilized
society maintain basic principles of consent and human rights. These are
expressed in the Nuremberg Code, the Bill of Rights, the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights, the Convention Against Torture, and so forth -- as well as
being tenets of basic ethics and morality.
Part I - Models of Synthetic Telepathy | Part II - Acoustic Signal Modulation | Part III - Working Models
Part IV - Bayesian Stopping Criterion
|