Part I - Motives for Mind Control | Part II - Resisting the Mind Control State | Part III - Mental Firewalls
Part III: Mental
Allen Barker, Feb 17, 2002
is the third of a three-part series of essays on mind control.
As the earlier essays explained, "mind control" is the term commonly
and historically used to describe clandestine operations to alter
human behavior and thought. The series focuses mainly on high-technology
techniques involving, for example, surveillance devices and electromagnetic
weapons -- though victims of all sorts of mind control techniques
have common experiences and sequelae. The first essay of the
series, "Motives for Mind Control," dealt
with some of the reasons that mind control harassment, torture,
and exploitation happens and why it continues. The second
the Mind Control State," dealt with ways to protest and resist
mind control abuses in a supposedly "free" society. In this
final part, I explore some of the methods and techniques that victims
have developed to help them resist these ongoing human rights atrocities
committed every day against their bodies and minds. In a sense
we are going to have a look at mind control torture from the torture
victim's point of view, from "inside" the mind of the victim.
This essay is
written from the point of view of someone experiencing real torture from externally
induced mind control phenomena, including induced voices in the head, surveillance,
harassment from various sources, and nonlethal aversive jolts. While
I make no secret of the fact that I have personally been subjected to a similar
sort of mind control torture, this is not my story. Of course it is
influenced by events I have experienced, but the essay is a composite from
my interactions with many mind control victims (and provocateurs) over the
past few years. I will save the actual details of my own experiences
for my lawyers or for prosecutors when that time comes, or perhaps for other
writings I might choose to make public. Thus, in keeping with the earlier
parts of the series, you do not even have to believe me about my having been
tortured -- though it all happened. There are many people in
the world, including many American citizens, who have experienced very similar
things. You can even think that all of those people made it all
up, and still have to be concerned despite your Holocaust denial.
The technology undoubtedly exists right now to carry out the sorts of torture
operations described in this essay, and will only become more advanced with
I cover a lot
of different techniques and possibilities in this essay, but keep in mind
that the truth is bad enough. What we already know and can document
is bad enough, and is only the tip of the iceberg. In the spirit of
mentioning all the possibilities, though, let me briefly discuss mental illness
here. There truly are some people with mental illnesses which occur
naturally. There are also people with mental illnesses which were externally
and purposely inflicted, for example by harassment operations. And there
are mind control victims who are completely normal except that they have undergone
years and years of some of the most hideous torture imaginable -- in a lying,
despicable society that denies it, ignores it, and further tortures the victims.
We know this from documented sources; what the government has admitted is
bad enough. I hope this essay will prove helpful even to victims who
suffer from true mental illness. I call them victims also because the
cowardly U.S. government has hidden behind the skirts of the mentally ill
to commit some of the worst atrocities imaginable, and the truly mentally
ill are victimized by this as well. The mentally ill are also known
to have been used as guinea pigs in mind control experiments precisely because
they would tend to be disbelieved and are relatively powerless victims for
torturers to experiment on. Some victims may have been poisoned by drugs
engineered to cause them psychological problems -- and I do not mean ordinary
street drugs. Others have had psychosurgery, microwave harassment, etc.,
which can cause organic problems in addition to psychological problems.
And of course, the mind is really not separate from the body and psychological
torture is just as bad as direct physical torture.
are still free to think what they want -- to the extent that that still means
anything -- and some will try to second guess the victims and provide armchair
diagnoses of the victims' problems. People who try to dismiss true torture
victims as just mentally ill will receive and deserve the utmost contempt
from the victims and from those decent people who know what is really going
on. And we will remember. For the reasons described in Part II,
the psychiatric and psychological "communities" cannot be trusted, except
for a few actual healers here and there.
Much of this
essay contains a sort of analysis that it is fashionable among the pseudo-intelligentsia
to dismiss as just black-and-white thinking. These people have their
sixth-grade epiphany that not everything is black-and-white, and for the rest
of their lives go around justifying anything convenient with this amoral relativism.
They never realize (or it just does not suit their lies) that while nothing
is black-and-white, some things are close enough that they might as well be.
I will be writing about Nazi pigs, and I mean this in the sense of "Mengele
the Nazi pig," not any other cultural pig association. Those who dismiss
this sort of thinking perhaps would think differently if they had ever experienced
real torture or were capable of the slightest bit of empathy. There
is no doubt that this sort of thinking has been misused and misapplied at
various times, but I cannot worry about how every moron might misunderstand
or misapply what I write. People may well misapply things I have written
here, or use them to create some propaganda distraction from what I am actually
writing about, but I am describing it the way it is. If you don't call
a Nazi a Nazi you end up with Nazism by some other name.
has had to develop his or her own method of coping with the torture.
I am not trying to impose my methods on anyone. A religious person under
torture finds strength in his or her religion, so some Zen Buddhist philosophy
may necessarily be apparent in my writing. In the ignorant U.S. there
are still people who will blame a victim for being Buddhist, a major world
religion. Of course Mengele the pig tries to justify and rationalize
his acts of torture in any and all ways possible. There are the usual
myriad ways of blaming and smearing the victims and rationalizing away the
acts of the torturer.
I hope that
this essay will help some victims. I know that I have benefited from
the work of other victims who had the courage to speak out about their experiences.
Much of this essay deals with the mental "game" of mind control, which is
of course not a game at all to the torture victims. You can compare
it to having to face mock executions each day. There is also the physical
intimidation many victims experience. As a victim might put it, if it
is all in my head then who harassed me on the highway? Why did my mail
all arrive opened? Why did my phone regularly ring twice a day with
hang-up calls? Why did many of my internet posts stop propagating anywhere?
Why did a police car pull up beside mine every time I talked about China,
on the drive to my honeymoon? The unfortunate reality is that the victims
have to develop their own methods to deal with the constant, credible physical
threats of death or worse. I wish I could help there, but I do what
I can. This is a barbaric and savage nation.
What is a Firewall?
For the purposes
of this essay, let me digress a bit here and describe the concept of a firewall.
A firewall, in the historical sense, is a wall built between connected buildings
and specifically constructed so that a fire in one unit of the structure will
not spread to the other units. In a more recent sense, a firewall is a
device on a computer network that keeps nodes of the network separated, for
instance so that a hacker attack on one node of the network cannot spread to
connected nodes of the network.
For our purposes,
we can consider all the computers on a network to be like houses on a street.
(Network engineers, please bear with me.) Each house has several doors
into it, which correspond to what are called ports on a networked computer.
A computer actually has thousands of ports, but the principle is illustrated
by considering a house with several doors. All the houses have inhabitants
in them, who send out messengers to the other houses: But some houses
send out the equivalent of burglars also. When the inhabitants of one
house want to communicate with the inhabitants of another, they send a messenger
to a particular door of the house they want to communicate with. The
messenger knocks on the door.
Now, the inhabitants
of the house can either open the door and let the messenger in or ignore the
knock. If they let the messenger in, they can restrict what he is allowed
to do while in the house. The messenger may, for example, pick up a
piece of paper and carry it back to his house. This would correspond
to a file transfer over a network. If the inhabitants of the house accidentally
leave a door open, though, a messenger may be able to come in the house without
permission and do whatever they like, again without permission. (There
are many doors because a messenger occupies a particular door the whole time
he is "in the house.")
in this analogy, would correspond to a complete facade built around a house
(or group of houses, to be picky). The actual house is not even visible
from the street. The doors of the original house are only visible to
messengers if the inhabitants of the house build corresponding
doors in the facade. To enter the house in this scenario, a messenger
would have to first knock at some visible door of the facade, be allowed in,
and then knock at and be allowed into the actual door of the house.
In this way the security of the house is greatly increased from unwanted intrusions.
(And you can have a collection of trusted houses "inside the fort" which are
less protected from each other.)
The title of
this essay, "Mental Firewalls," comes from an article by Timothy L. Thomas
which appeared in the Army War College journal Parameters in Spring
1998. It was titled "The Mind Has No Firewalls." The Army has
an often honorable tradition going back to the Revolutionary War, the minutemen,
and so forth. But it also has had and still has some treason in its
ranks. This is just the "ground truth," the "facts on the ground."
An army that tortures the domestic population is an occupation army.
Treasonous Nazi pigs, in this real sense rather than some spin machine crap
or some pathological liar's bullshit, must be dealt with accordingly.
This holds for all branches of the military. This holds for law enforcement
as well. It holds for all intelligence agencies also. It holds
even when they pretend the torture devices "don't exist." Even if the
victim does not realize what is happening to him or her, it is still torture.
Informed consent must be truly informed. Torturing an American citizen
is at least as treasonous as selling the nation's top secrets to a
was in fact entered into evidence as part of a lawsuit by Harlan Girard of
the International Committee for the Convention Against Offensive Microwave
Weapons. The article's central metaphor is that human beings are like
the computers on a network, except that they do not have the ability to control
the information traffic entering and leaving them. Their ports, or doors,
are wide open. This sort of analogy was prevalent during the military
"information warfare" buzzword phase, and illustrates the sort of thinking
that was going on at the time. [On a note of caution, not all of Thomas'
article should be taken literally; whether purposefully or not there is some
likely disinfo there.]
Against the Human "Biocomputer"
What is it that
corresponds to your reality? What do you perceive, and how do you make
your decisions? You receive information through your eyes, ears, and other
senses. You read the information from the writers you choose to read,
and listen to the speakers you have access to -- very often these days from
TV, radio, or the internet. You think to yourself, in your private inner
voice. You visualize and imagine. In information warfare against
individuals all of these are thought of as nothing but information channels
that can be blocked, censored, co-opted, faked, forged, impersonated, or otherwise
controlled to manipulate an individual. If you can control all the information
an individual receives then you can control their whole perceived reality.
Like the hypnotized subject who does something which violates his ethics while
being persuaded to imagine he is doing something else entirely, the information
warfare subject is acting in a fantasy world created precisely to manipulate
him to do what his controllers want. This is known as a deception operation.
control, as far as I know, is not yet possible, but the principles still hold
for whatever approximation can be achieved. And the principles have
been put into practice. Of course "information warfare" is a buzzword
and most of it is just a take on the ages-old practices of propaganda, lying,
and manipulation. But a new buzzword generates funding, and perhaps
more importantly serves to morally distance the new "clean" practices from
the dirty, filthy business of amorally manipulating human beings like pawns,
with complete disregard for unalienable human rights. What was new at
the time of information warfare was 1) the internet as a widespread societal
force, and 2) the wider development of neuroinfluencing and so-called nonlethal
weapons that can directly influence people's brains.
and technology develop ever more advanced prosthetic devices, people will
increasingly become cyborgs -- as is already happening. Because of this
trend these issues will become increasingly clear with time. That is,
it will become increasingly common to have computer devices implanted in one's
body. If someone hacks into your home computer and steals or manipulates
your data then a crime has been committed and you should rightly be angry.
But if someone hacks into your physical body, brain, and mind the violation
is incomparably greater.
The Basic Modern
Mind Control Torture Operation
In this section
I will describe the basic torture setup used against our hypothetical, composite
mind control torture victim. The focus is on the effects that the victim
experiences, not necessarily the particular technology that is used to inflict
it. Remember in all of this that the torture any individual receives can
vary. It will vary according to the torturers' motives and technology,
but will also be tailored to the psychology of the victim. What might
bother one person would not bother another. The "professional" torturers
will start according to how their torture manuals say to go about torturing
someone with your profile, but almost all torturers will refine the torture
to the individual if they can. As they learn what bothers you they can
focus on that more and more in their torture. As you read this, keep that
in mind. These torturers are not any different from the sort you might
read about in Red Cross literature, who shock the genitals of victims, etc.,
except that they have access to abuse the most advanced technology and hide
behind an evil U.S. government which sinks to the lowest common denominator
of the torturers it protects.
First of all,
the victim is under constant surveillance. The victim is harassed overtly
and covertly, on the street, on internet, etc. All forms of taunting
and goading tend to occur. For example, there is a "Marco Polo" type
of "can you catch me" taunting. Any and all sorts of high-tech and low-tech
harassment are used. (Just because it is sophomoric or pathetic does
not mean they will not do it. In fact, this increases the likelihood
that the victims will be ridiculed if they complain. Remember the shoe
powder to make Castro's beard fall out?) The victim soon has to wonder
about everything that breaks or goes wrong in their lives. The harassers
use their surveillance to see what troubles the victim is having and then
try to "take credit" for causing them. The torturers are often arrogant
and even incompetent at their vile torture "jobs" despite using the most advanced
technology to commit treason.
The victim is
purposely isolated. People close to them are threatened or deceptions
are created to make the victim suspect those closest to him or her.
Deceptions are launched so victims will blame innocent neighbors for the harassment.
(Unfortunately, in the despicable circles of mind control torture, it sometimes
is a neighbor or even a close family member that truly is responsible.
There might be an out-of-control "safe house" next door, for example.)
The victim is
zapped inside his or her home (or a deception operation is launched so the
victim thinks this is what is happening). Heart rhythm palpitations
induced by remote technology can cause terror to an individual inside his
or her home.
mind is under assault with voice projection, voice cloning. The Village
Voice, in an article from July 2001 titled "Psycho Warfare," described
an Air Force report uncovered by Nick Begich. Quoting from the article,
technology may be able to create high-fidelity speech in humans, "raising
the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction." It may
be possible to "talk" to selected adversaries "in a fashion that would be
most disturbing to them."
This is exactly
what they do, and there are several different technologies documented in the
open literature which can achieve this. Some victims may be test cases
for such psychological harassment techniques, or the method may already be "perfected"
and in covert operational use. [They don't mention this in psych textbooks
or in movies about "schizophrenics," do they?]
hours a day, the victim is subjected to commands, ridicule, and distractions
inside his or her private mind. How would it feel if you heard a voice
in your head asking, "Can you hear this?" as if someone were calibrating a
torture device? The brain wants to respond; it was never meant to be
violated in these ways. Interrogation. What might bother you?
Any secrets, etc., the pigs might tease out and harass you with? Anything
that would insult you they could focus on? Anything that might distract
you they could keep you distracted with?
victims' supposedly private, subvocalized thoughts are somehow read, or inferred
and analyzed. There are various levels at which this can occur, from
remote heartbeat and eye gaze analysis all the way up to brain implants telemetering
EEG signals. Not all victims report this level of surveillance, and
certainly just the other harassment techniques mentioned above result in a
grotesque human rights abuse. But many victims discover that even their
supposedly private thoughts are being violated and manipulated.
How do you deal
with "ordinary" social interactions with the pigs harassing you constantly in
your mind? Do you act "ethically" and warn everyone you interact with
that their privacy is also being invaded, by way of you, against your consent?
People you interact with either believe you or they don't, but either way the
social dynamic is completely changed. The pigs invade the privacy of everyone
around you, by using you, even that of your spouse and children. They
may also impersonate anyone you see, in your mind, to make it seem as if that
person is the one "contacting" you. They try to make it seem like everyone
can hear your private thoughts, that you are "broadcasting" to everyone.
(Of course some victims might actually be doing that; if they can read your
thoughts they could then broadcast them wide-field or local-field...)
What sort of
career are you "allowed" to have in a system where your intellectual property
is stolen the minute you think it up and where you have to cope with both
"regular" harassment as well as harassment in your mind? All this is
in addition to the ordinary stresses of the job -- and not to mention that
some jobs require actual mental concentration. How sociable are long-term
harassment victims with serious cases of Ongoing Traumatic Stress Disorder?
In American society there are also plenty of vicious jerks who, while not
Nazis or torturers, are quick to sense perceived weaknesses in people and
home in on them. The Nazis can often just wound a person and then throw
him or her to the sharks, bleeding.
It is natural
for humans to think about other people. It is even natural to run a
mental simulacrum process to imagine and empathize with other people.
Monkey see, monkey do, air guitar, "I was just thinking of you..." etc.
The rapist pigs try to turn this against the human beings they torture.
Sex is also a natural process, as is farting, masturbation, defecation, burping,
spats with people, fantasy, and so forth. The rapist torturers
try to turn this against their victims. They constantly attempt to demean
their victims. Worrying and anxiety are also normal human emotions.
The torturers, though, try to turn all of these human properties against their
the Nazi pigs use is to try to reinforce anything you might worry about or
feel anxious about. It is like taking a dynamical system and driving
it at its natural frequency in order to purposely destroy it. Of course
this is not to say the idiots know anything about dynamical systems.
If you ever read Lord of the Flies in junior high school you know about
the level that these pig idiots operate at, but when they rape your brain
to inflict such ridicule and hatefulness it sets up positive feedback processes
in the brain that constitute torture. (If I am teaching these idiots
anything by this, then you had better watch out because they have already
tortured me.) They will purposely injure you and then pick at your scabs
if you start to heal.
also happens because you know damn well you are under surveillance
and the pig ridicule squad is there to taunt you. Try not thinking
about something you are conditioned with "cattle prods" into knowing will
result in harassment. You know the torturers will zap you -- that is
why they goad you with triggers at times -- but it is like not thinking
of a pink elephant on command. Yins produce yangs, so to speak.
Transcending the yins and yangs is hard enough without the torture.
treat your personal, private, internal speech as if it were your public speech.
They try to subject you to all the ignorance and "political correctness" and
everything else that someone at a podium in a public place might be subjected
to. The sadist nanny state is not just concerned with what you say in
your own home, they want to regulate what you think inside your head also.
That can really cause your "moron anticipator" thought pattern to distract
from your normal private thinking, because you cannot even think your private
thoughts without knowing they will be "reviewed" for you by rapist morons.
of Magician-Like Illusions to Deceive Victims
for thought inference does exist, but it is important to keep in mind the ways
in which magician-like deception operations can be applied to a person to make
it seem to them that their mind is being read. While some victims'
thoughts are read, all of these techniques have likely been tested on
nonconsenting American citizens. The classic example is where the "magician"
first subliminally "inserts" a thought into a victims brain and then later the
magician "reveals" what the person was thinking. By waving his hands and
strongly suggesting to the victim that his thoughts are being read, the victim
sees the phony "evidence" and tends to believe that is what is happening.
The outrage, indignation, and terror responses the victim is feeling will also
tend to interfere with his or her reasoning processes. Advanced profiling
and prediction, based on standard surveillance techniques, is another possible
means for deceiving a person into thinking their mind is being read. While
some victims have undoubtedly had such deceptions inflicted on them, the black
budget torturers -- before they will admit the true extent of technological
advancement -- will likely try to claim this is what was done in all cases.
Purposefully setting up the illusion of mind reading on a victim, though, is
every bit as despicable and criminal as actually doing it.
The setup for
the elementary example above can be carried out with only a basic voice-to-skull
projection device with the victim in range for some period of time.
Suppose you wanted the victim to think about blue violets, for example.
You could beam at the victim very quiet suggestions of "blue violet."
You could send them a song that they thought just got stuck in their heads.
You could use voice cloning technology and try to fake their own voice in
their head. Another technique is to transmit a word or phrase that is
closely associated with what you want the victim to think about or do, and
let their brain's associative memory do the rest. Now, after the subliminal
send, the tension and drama build until the sadist magician culminates this
particular deception operation against the mark (a.k.a. human being).
The magician sends an email to, say, a public mailing list the victim is known
to read. In the text of the message the magician works in the phrase
"blue violet" -- perhaps combined with a subtle threat.
The above example
is only the most elementary, of course. What if two victims
were interacting, how could a pair of them be manipulated? The
variations include two nonconsensual victims, or a consensual harasser
messing with a nonconsensual victim. There are also witting
and unwitting victims; some have figured out parts of what is going
on (intended or not) while others have not. Some have been purposely
duped into misinterpreting what is going on -- they may think they are psychic, for example.
What about wide-field projection devices? If two interacting
people are given the same subliminal stimuli, how might they interpret
it? If you weren't paying close attention, would you know if
you were the sender or the receiver? Especially if the manipulation
continued for a long period without your awareness, perhaps even from
childhood. When PTSD is purposely induced, the victim is that
much more susceptible. Then you can consider the case where
there are far more than two victims interacting: a society of
would-be slavemasters and those they would hold as slaves. The
general situation involves multiple victims and multiple perpetrators,
There are many,
many different scenarios. I even considered writing an academic paper
on the topic, something like "Mind Control Games People Play." Suppose
you assume a particular set of technologies is available. What
logically follows from that? It is like science fiction except that
the reality these days is beyond science fiction. The military might
call it wargaming. It is amazing the hideous sorts of operations that
are possible with only your basic secret video/audio surveillance of an individual.
Now assume that a targetable voice projection device exists. What could
the people controlling it do in the worst case? What sorts of deceptions
could they carry out? What countermeasures could be adopted? When
it really does exist and the consequences are so far-reaching, isn't
it unconscionable to leave the public in the dark about it? Could a
politician resist abusing this secret power?
For the purposes
of the rest of this essay I will assume our composite victim has been "injected"
or implanted somehow with a "brain bug" that transmits tracking information
as well as audio and video of the sights, sounds, and internal subvocalized
"thoughts" the nonconsenting victim experiences. This is something like
an advanced form of the CIA's "Acoustic Kitty" project from the 1960s, where
a cat was wired up as a motor-controlled listening device to be used in spying.
The difference is many years of technological refinement -- integrated circuits
were not even available then, let alone nano-scale devices -- and the obvious
difference that a human being is being tortured. I assume that this
device can also inject sounds which the victim perceives as if he or she "heard"
or "thought" them in internal speech. This is somewhat less control
than what some victims report experiencing, but nonetheless is sufficient
to illustrate most of the methods. Even if such devices are not available
to some particular group, variations of most of the techniques can be created
by lower-tech methods like standard surveillance devices and external "zapping"
or voice projection devices which are publicly known to exist. The point
is not the particular technological implementation, but what the victim experiences.
Idiot and the Autopig
The term I use
for an external voice projected into a victim's mind is the realtime idiot.
For an illustration of what the realtime idiots "seem like," consider a secret
studio like at a radio station. The "DJs" in this case are the rapists
"monitors" who sit and listen to the violated thoughts of the victim.
These torturers also have microphones where they can "converse" with the unfortunate
victim in realtime. The victim hears these transmitted voices in his or
her head. Perhaps the rapists also have a virtual reality computer display
of everything the victim is doing at the time, or even a display of exactly
what the victim "sees" through his or her eyes. Any thoughts the victim
has, the realtime idiots try to pretend it is like a conversation with them.
You could not think a rhetorical question to yourself in your own private thoughts
without the realtime idiot's comments. You could not pause for a moment
of silent mental reflection. They comment on things, they harass, they
goad, they distract, they try to issue "commands," they attempt to demean the
victims ("Go brush your teeth"). This all while the victim tries to live
his or her regular, "ordinary" life and interact in the phony society.
At this point
I have described the technique whereby Nazi pigs beam words and voices into
the mind of the victims in order to harass and torture them. This requires
too many low-level Auschwitz guards, though. These dumb sadists may
get drunk and start talking, or they may get religion and try to expose their
former activities. The need for personnel also limits the number of
victims, or "subscribers," who can be controlled by the system. The
American answer, of course, is to use technology to automate the process and
increase productivity. This results in a device I call the autopig
(or the Cameron/Delgado memorial autopig).
at its simplest is just a digital recorder that sends fixed "messages" to
the victims at random times. This is very similar to Cameron's psychic
driving torture that he inflicted on people coming in for psychiatric health
care. I sometimes call these random "pulses" Bergeron pulses after Vonnegut's
short story "Harrison Bergeron" (not the movie, which is good but different
from the short story). In the story all people were forced to be "equal"
by handicapping those with exceptional abilities, and strong thinkers had
to wear a device which would periodically emit a loud tone designed to disrupt
the their thought stream.
Of course an
autopig could also be used as a computer-aided torture device so that a single
human torturer could switch between victims, secure in knowing that none of
them was being left alone in their "private" minds. The Delgado part
comes in when the device gets feedback from the victim's brain and sends an
"appropriate" message. That is, the sensor system analyzes the brain
rape data, an AI-like algorithm decides what sort of response to send to the
victim, and then the digital voice simulator constructs it and sends it.
Thus each victim has his or her own "electric fence" or something like the
invisible fencing they use on dogs but more technologically sophisticated.
(You can consider things like stateful autopigs and stateless, or memoryless,
autopigs, and so forth. It is basic engineering.)
idiots and autopigs, there is something I call a Delgado button.
A Delgado button is a button the harassers can press and which stimulates
some part of the brain. There may be many Delgado buttons, for example,
and the harassers learn what each one does empirically by observing the victims.
To the victim a Delgado button would just feel like some sensation, experience,
or emotion came over them all of a sudden. It might occur at a particularly
inappropriate time, for example. It might also serve as a distraction
when the pigs wanted to stop some particular thought train you were having.
It might be difficult to notice; some subjects in published research would
rationalize such induced behaviors and say that they just decided to do whatever
behavior the buttons evoked. A Delgado button also need not literally
be a button and a brain electrode, it could also be something like a microwave
beam at a particular frequency and with a particular modulation aimed at a
person. Metaphorically there can also be conditioned "software" Delgado
buttons in addition to the hardware wired-in electrode buttons.
Now that I have
described the basic mind control operation, in this section I consider the problem
of data analysis for a victim of such crimes. Don't blame the victims;
try to understand the hideous position they were thrown into and which they
in no way got to choose. Naive science-dude has probably not spent 5 minutes
considering what victims are forced to agonize over for years. The situation
is closer to game theory with a malicious "opponent" rather than to the usual
study of natural science, where natural phenomena are considered to be repeatable
(or at least indifferent).
must rely mostly on their own sensations and introspection; that is just the
nature of this sort of advanced, secret torture. This is not to say
that evidence of the "ordinary" sorts of harassment should not be collected,
or that a breakthrough will not occur and someone will learn how to detect
whatever signals or devices are used to inflict the mind control torture and
make it available to the victims. The first challenge for the victim,
though, is just to figure out what is really going on. Many do not even
have the language to describe what is happening to them. They have to
see beyond the stagecraft ("tradecraft") of the Nazi technical illusionists.
The victims need to live their lives each day with whatever mental firewall
countermeasures they can adopt in their minds. Beyond this they can
gather evidence to convince other people or for a lawsuit. They will
discover, though, that for the time being the court system, like the psychiatric
system, is part of the problem.
How many times
does someone have to beam a clearly external voice into your head before you
have to question all your thoughts? Not too many times, once really.
Some victims of this "one-shot" voice projection mind control may still suffer
for years. When will you believe they are not reading your thoughts
or that they are not trying to manipulate you? When the truth commission
reveals the crimes? No, you will never believe them again once you know
how the pigs operate. Most victims suffer from far more than just one
voice projection experience, though.
External Thoughts and Sensory Inputs
Inside the mind,
the torture victims really are human beings just like everyone else (even though
they are treated worse than anyone would treat a dog). They see with their
eyes, hear with their ears, etc., have internal dialogs thinking about things,
sparks of intuition, and all the usual features of the human mind. As
mentioned earlier, these are the processes the mind controllers attempt to hijack.
For the victims we can consider that their thoughts fall into three categories:
internals, conditioned internals, and externals.
is a normal, natural thought grounded in external sensory input that the person
consensually engages in. The usual thought model that most people have
the luxury of believing is that all of their interactions are consensual and
that their private thoughts are actually private and not tampered with.
That is, they only experience internals.
is a nonconsensual input, like Cameron's psychic driving where a person is
strapped down and forced to listen to manipulative recording loops.
In the modern sense, the externals are the voices projected into a person's
mind from an external source. (You can theoretically have consensual
externals, even of this sort, but the victims certainly never saw a consent
form and you'd be a fool to consent to having the pigs the victims are familiar
with have anything to do with your mind.) The signal from a programmed
autopig chip in the head would also count as an external. An external
could also be an email from a Nazi that is based on mind-raped data.
Any normally consensual interaction becomes an external when mind-raped data
or psychological triggers are purposely embedded there.
internal, in the sense being discussed here, is an internal thought process
that is a direct result of the torture by externals. The mental "fruit
of the poisoned tree," so to speak. After a week or so of having "you
are a good marine" drilled into your head from nonconsensual externals, then
when the machine is turned off there will likely still be the tendency to
hear the phrase. (Besides whatever other damage such harassment causes.)
This is especially true if the conditioning was specifically focused on certain
stimuli -- though random stimuli also become conditioned in the same way that
a bell ring is associated to the bowl of food by the salivating dog.
A similar-sounding phrase, for example, can serve as a trigger for a conditioned
internal. Conditioning during trauma is also strong and long-lasting
and can bring back vivid feelings of the original torture experience.
can probably get some unwitting victims to march around their own homes like
controlled robots. People's sensitivity to what is internal or external
"in their head" would vary according to the person. Age, length of abuse,
and the particular technology and techniques used would also influence who
becomes "witting nonconsensual." Perhaps this is a part of what determines
who they harass and try to "break" and who they secretly control. Those
susceptible to hypnosis might be especially vulnerable, and some victims may
be influenced only while they sleep. (Is it terrorism to call for blowing
up a Nazi torture center that "doesn't exist"?)
A way to verify
that a signal is purely external is via the protocol. This protocol
assumes you have a cooperative person on the other end of the external channel
you wish to authenticate. In practice, what you learn is that if there
is such an external channel you do not have a "friendly witting" on the
other end. (And victims know from long experience that there is such an
external channel.) That is, the protocol is a way that a "friendly witting"
could authenticate to you the existence of an information channel that supposedly
If you have
visual, auditory, or tactile contact with a person the protocol is easy.
(It is better if they cannot see or hear you, since that constitutes
another, uncontrolled data path.) Suppose you can hear a person talking.
Then the protocol is to think to yourself something like, "say 4533."
You may wish to choose something else they could say without attracting attention,
if that is a problem, but be sure it is something which is very unlikely without
a mental send. Count, say, five seconds for a response. Either
they hear your thoughts or not, and they either respond or not. In this
case the channel is specific to a person and may not exist or the person may
not be a "friendly." For visual contact the situation is similar, you
can think something like, "hold up three fingers." Notice that this
protocol also works for something like listening to a realtime broadcast such
as radio. A similar protocol works for written media, think "write the
number 6423" and email it to me or put it in your newspaper column.
Note, though, that in all cases there may still be a hidden "man in the middle."
You can actually
verify a pure external send and receive without visual, auditory, or tactile
contact. Just the "mental" contact. This applies to anyone and
everyone who can hear your thoughts and send a reply. It requires that
you have a calculator, and a cooperative person with a calculator on the other
end of the channel. The protocol is, "What is the cosine of 1999?"
The first four digits after the decimal, in radians, one at a time.
If the pigs cannot send that data they are either retarded or engaging in
a conspiracy. There are a couple of other possibilities, including pure
internals, but the point is to have a cryptographic authentication challenge
to verify a pure external send and receive. Anyone can punch
the buttons 1, 9, 9, 9, cos on a calculator. I do not know the answer,
but I can check it easily. [You should change the number 1999 to something
else for your own protocol, since you want to be able to conclude a pure external
read and send. The number is something you only think "to yourself,"
and choose a new challenge number each time you check a response with a calculator.]
send valid four-digit numeric data, let alone the correct answer. They
do send numerics, though, and could presumably program the answer into the
autopig. And they get sloppy sometimes and you get a good strong piece
of data that indicates external reads and sends, even though they do not send
the protocol. This is one reason such a protocol is useful: It
illustrates what the ideal data would look like for a remote read and send,
and can help clarify more ambiguous situations. But keep in mind possible
magician-like deceptions as were mentioned earlier.
In evaluating uncertain
data in the real world, including that from hostile sources, it is important
to calibrate the expected level of background noise. If you are reading
the torture between the lines, you also need to keep your head and not go off
on too much unconnected symbolism. Keep this in mind when reading items
that truly could not possibly relate to you or your situation. This gives
you an idea of the basic background level for symbols, etc., to appear.
Keep a threshold and discard any questionable data. The good data points
tend to be frequent enough, and at some point even they do not tell you much
you do not already know.
As an example,
suppose you cursed the pigs, just in your head, sometimes. If you get
them angry they sometimes screw up. Say you were taunting them
by asking them whether they picked up your thoughts in Niger (as an random
example of a far-off place). By the way, you can taunt them all you
want in your head, since it is only you and the Nazis there. Likewise,
curse the pigs that bug your house all you want. They just do not seem
to understand that if they reveal anything they know about your private mentation
or private conversations in your home they cannot call you crazy. It
would be like entering the FBI tapes of Martin Luther King saying the FBI
was out to get him as evidence that he was paranoid. "The voice in my
head said I was crazy." Back to the Niger example, suppose you then
get email from someone claiming to be a victim, who has a name very similar
to yours, and who claims that he went to Niger and could not escape the harassment.
That seems pretty unlikely for a coincidence. Then the question is,
is the person a witting or unwitting harassment agent, i.e., is it another
victim manipulated into harassing you or is it a cointelpro agent? How
many people have been to Niger? Many victims are understandably afraid
to talk about such experiences, though.
One thing that
the mind controllers do -- and which manipulators and propagandists have done
for all time -- is to exploit weaknesses in human reasoning. The brain
is a fantastic, beautiful organ of the human body; no human being on the earth
should ever be tortured. But humans also tend to have some weaknesses
in evaluating data compared to, say, a mathematical algorithm. One difficulty
lies in dealing with uncertainty. The mind control victim is literally
overwhelmed with uncertainty and must sort things out as best as he or she can.
The victim has to consider every weird thing that has ever happened to him or
her, whether it is related, and knowing that the mind rapists will see this
thought process and try to reinforce any misconceptions. Another difficulty
is dealing with distractions, especially when they come in on a hostile "channel"
that the brain was never meant to be accessed on. Proportionality and
scale are another difficulty, and people tend to think binary rather than continuous,
and one-dimensional rather than multi-dimensional. People often have a
tendency toward superstitious thinking. Finally, in a social sense, people
are very bad at dealing with big lies, i.e., conspiracies of liars.
statistics. You can sometimes reason better with them. As an example,
you know that there are some people in the world you can trust; you
just don't know exactly which ones they are. You can often estimate
aggregate statistics better, since if you get one wrong here or there it all
averages out. Suppose you estimate, based on a great deal of data, that
posters on some mailing list are, say, 40% agents and provocateurs, 35% real
victims and activists, 15% who probably consider themselves scientific, nonsuperstitious
thinkers looking for the truth, and another 10% who are unclassifiable.
There are some who you are sure enough about to not worry with percentages,
but in general any particular person on that list is "suspect." Nonetheless,
the list can still function as a way to reach and connect the 35% of mind
control victims and activists. It may also serve as a way to convince
and educate some of the actual open-minded decent people who are not mind
control victims. Another use of aggregate statistics is to reason from
historical records. We know that there are thousands of mind
control victims in the population, at the least. We just do not know
which particular people claiming to be victims are the actual victims (or
which still unwitting people were/are victims). Never forget the humanity
of the real human beings involved in the statistics, though.
You are a human
being with unalienable human rights. Unalienable means that they cannot
be taken away. They can be violated, infringed, ignored, and even legislated
away, but the acts of a tyrant do not change the fact that you are a human being
with unalienable human rights. This means that the tyrant is always a
tyrant, and remains a tyrant, to meet the fate of tyrants. The same holds
for the lackeys and collaborators of tyrants. This is a fundamental asymmetry
between the citizen and the tyrant.
the torturer. The dignity of the torture victim cannot be taken away
by the torturer, but the act of torture destroys the dignity of the torturer.
This is not enough punishment for such hideous crimes, but gives cause to
pity the torturer even as you work to hang the pig. Let me explain about
what I mean about justice for the victims of these treasonous Nazis, who commit
crimes against their fellow American citizens in peacetime which would be
war crimes even against an enemy in warfare. Under a legitimate government
such people would receive life sentences in a humane prison system.
That would be my preference, but the United States currently has neither.
So when I talk about hanging the pigs I am referring to whatever justice-type
processes can be set into motion. That was the subject of Part II.
Get the right ones. We will not forget, and when these pigs are 75 years
old they are still Nazi pigs and still serve the rest of their worthless lives
in a humane prison cell if such exists. The legitimate government
treats mind control torture like the true crime it is, even when government
agents are involved in committing the crimes.
You have absolute
free mentation in your brain and mind. Your freedom of thought is unalienable.
The Nazi Pig
The adjective, "Auschwitz-level,"
to describe these crimes, is not hyperbole. If you do not feel
like you need to vomit, you probably do not really understand the full
sickness of mind control crimes. Gordon Thomas wrote in
the introduction to his book Journey Into Madness: The True Story
of CIA Mind Control and Medical Abuse: "In
working on this book I have had to come to terms with my own emotions
-- disbelief, bewilderment, disgust, and anger and, more than once
in the early stages, a feeling that the subject was simply too evil
to cope with. Nothing I had researched before could have prepared
me for the dark reality of doctors who set out to deliberately destroy
minds and bodies they were trained to heal." Torturers
can never blame their victims, though they invariably try.
These torturers are the sorts of people who will repeatedly hit a
bound and gagged victim with a stick and then try to claim the victim
caused it. They'll steal from you and then complain about the
property they stole; they'll rape you and sneer at the quality of
brings me to what I refer to as the Nazi Pig Theorem (NPT).
Strictly speaking it is a metaphorical axiom, but it can be very
useful to the torture victim. It basically asserts that if
you act like Mengele then you are a Nazi pig. Then there are
a few obvious conclusions that are also part of the "theorem."
Nazi Pig Theorem (NPT):
Anyone who nonconsensually violates your brain/mind/mentation
using Mengele-like methods is a Nazi pig.
do not care what a Nazi pig thinks. You do not care
about a Nazi pig's opinions. You do not respond to
a Nazi pig ridiculing you, threatening you, trying to distract
you, or otherwise trying to manipulate you.
work to get a Nazi pig hanged.
Isn't that obvious? Don't you believe it? Then remember it and act
like you know it. NPT is as sharp as a razor.
of NPT is also useful: If they are not Nazi pigs then they are not raping
your brain. So you can think anything about anyone; it's just you and
the Nazis in your mind, and their opinions do not matter at all. If
you have a passing thought about someone and the Nazis try to harass you with
it or make you feel guilty about it, it does not matter. The Nazi pigs'
opinions do not matter (unless they somehow help to get the pigs hanged).
If you think some thought about someone who really is raping your brain,
then you have some worse things to think about that Nazi piece of human garbage
than what floated through your brain originally.
One use of the
Nazi Pig Theorem is to try to go on with ordinary life even as you are being
tortured and you know the true, evil nature of the society you are living
in. Spend some time each day working for justice in the physical world,
and the rest of the time try to ignore the Nazi pigs and get on with your
life as best as you can. My philosophy is basically to wish people well,
and any differences I have had with people are all water under the bridge
after not too long. But atrocities never, ever pass under the bridge.
The victims never forget, and never should forget. Of course any victim
is free to choose to forgive his or her torturers, but for torturers to lecture
their victims about forgiveness is the "Christianity" of the oppressor.
Forgiveness also does not preclude justice.
reality is that when dealing with anyone, they are either a Nazi or a non-Nazi.
Torture makes it that clear. This is the top node of the decision
tree for the torture victim, and it is a stark split. The following
diagram illustrates the split:
That is clear
enough. Of course the difficult part is that you do not know exactly
who is a Nazi pig and who is not. So you might start off with a reasonable
benefit of the doubt and collect evidence from there to update your current
assumptions. But how do you deal with someone you think has a 10% chance
of being a Nazi pig? How do you deal with someone you think has an 80%
chance of being a Nazi pig? That is your own utility/decision function
and it is not easy. People have to make decisions based on imperfect
information all the time, but this purposefully inflicted torture pushes it
past what people are accustomed to have to deal with in ordinary situations.
Nonetheless, the government is accountable for the aggregate situation where
torture occurs regularly and systematically in American society.
The NPT is your
firewall. As a corollary, the external firewall theorem states
that you do not care in the slightest bit what Mengele thinks. Analyze
the external incomings for nature and source, as well as for other evidence
if you choose to, and then send them straight to your mental /dev/null.
Then work each day to get the pigs hanged in the real world, in the best way
you can figure to do it (see Part II). There is also an internal
firewall theorem: Your brain is your own to think whatever you want
with. Simply invoke IFT and think about something entirely different
if you are thinking something that you don't want to be thinking about.
Train yourself toward that, at any rate.
for Thinking about the Harassment
The way to think
of a nonconsensual external is as an advanced cattle prod that can be modulated
in various ways to cause you pain. The modulation happens to be with words
or clicks, but that is secondary. It is a modulated cattle prod.
Notice it and try to get a feel for the nature and source of the signal.
Where does it seem to be coming from? What is the quality of the signal?
Later you can analyze the psyop sentence the pigs modulated onto the cattle
prod signal if you feel like it. (This may reveal more about them than
about you; the modulation is based on "you" reflected off of their filthy Nazi
distorting mirror -- with their intention being to cause you harm.) You
might keep a rough histogram count on the autopig phrases, for example.
Does the signal ever have a foreign accent or speak a foreign language?
Probably not. But basically understand that the Nazi pigs are complete,
pathological liars. If they flatter you one second they'll kick you in
the head three beats later, you can almost count on it. Pathological liars
only tell the nominal truth as part of a larger lie, and the purpose is to destroy
your mental well-being and your life.
semantics (signal before semantics). The source is where the signal
comes from, both the "person" sending it and the sensory input method by which
you receive it. The semantics is the meaning of the signal: it is the
interpretation of the signal and its modulation. For example, the semantics
of a signal will often be its interpretation as an English sentence.
If the signal comes in on a rape channel, do not even give it a semantics
except perhaps as part of an evidence-gathering process. It is just
a sensation you feel from the external cattle prod. The presence of
the nonconsensual external signal itself is torture and is the only real information,
since the modulation is by pathological liars whose intention is to cause
the autopig (or the realtime idiot). Even if it's easy. (Unless
you feel like it.) They hate it when you ignore them. Go on with
your ordinary life, meeting people, etc., and especially speaking out and
working for justice in the real world. You can only really ignore them
when you know what is going on, though. Some of the people who they
march around their own homes like robots probably think they are just
ignoring it. There is a big difference between an experienced victim
deciding to ignore future signals and some well-meaning advice-giver who has
never been tortured telling you to "just ignore it."
If it is indistinguishable
from an autopig, treat it as if it were an autopig. With some basic
voice-recognition type software applied to raped subvocalized thoughts, I
could write an AI-like program that sounded just like the repetitive,
simple-patterned Nazi pigs I am familiar with. In this sense, the realtime
idiots do not even pass the Turing test. Actual people (who are not
torturers) have names, they do not repeat things endlessly, they think things
other than harassing you and commenting on your thoughts, and they can push
a few calculator buttons. For instance, why do you never hear someone
driving their car down the street thinking "use a turn signal, you asshole"?
your thinking to the Nazi pigs, it is better if they misunderstand what they
rape from you. By default you are only ever thinking to yourself.
Work toward the rapid extinction of the Nazi conditioning imposed on you,
at least as rapidly as you can manage. Try to extinguish your conditioned
responses and replace them with only an awareness of the triggering sensation.
Some are random events acting as triggers, while others are purposely inflicted.
It may help
to write about what you experience or keep a journal. There are pros
and cons to this, though, since the pigs will have access to what you write
also. It might provide them with feedback to help them torture you or
others. If you complain about something they will almost surely start
doing it to you more. You have to weigh whether writing about it helps
you to deal with it, like when you can share it with other people or when
you see how stupid it really looks when written out. Stupidity is no
barrier to the torturers, in fact it is part of the torture. For example,
if you make a self-deprecating joke it will not be long before the pigs are
goading you with the subject of that joke for real. Of course much of
the torture is never anything clever the torturers do, but your own knowledge
that these people who do not even know you nonetheless hate you enough to
violate your mind and then go to a great deal of effort to try to inflict
serious harm on you -- often seemingly for their own entertainment.
Try tuning out
the pigs like you might cure yourself of hiccups. It might work, or
at least help you train yourself to ignore the pigs. Notice the nature
and source of the signals, the mental gnats meant to annoy you. Parasitic
mind fleas. If you think like the monkey, you'll be as dumb as the monkey.
If you watch that TV too much you'll be as dumb as the morons on it.
They will entertain you right into digging your own grave.
How Can a Society
I Detest Defile Me?
How do you deal
with a secrecy-bred society of dumb-as-cows "innocent" people, Nazi pigs, and
victims? Or the collaborators, apologists, and profiteers?
What about the people who idiotically ask, "Why are you ongoing torture victims
so obsessed with your torture (and human rights, etc.)?" The social system
where no one can talk about the elephant in the living room, even though many
people know at least that something is there. Did people not get
born with tongues to speak with? Or is this a conspiracy of idiots and
cowards? What the hell is wrong with these people? What kind of
people complacently live in a society where torture regularly and systematically
occurs, pretending it doesn't? Is it still that old pig slaver mentality,
or the ability to look away from such abominations as an everyday thing?
For centuries it was forbidden to teach slaves basic skills like reading.
Is it better if you can read but only have access to lies?
Every day for
the mind control victims, it is like the rape victim who has to go out and
interact in the society where her rapist is still at large. The difference
is that there is a whole conspiracy of rapists and they rape the victims each
and every day. So perhaps it is closer to what were euphemistically
called "comfort girls." How do you think it feels to wake up with a
pig in your head? Is that the only alternative to being dumb as a cow
and wearing a gag in this society? The "consensus reality" of the average
citizen is far, far from the real truth on the ground.
the best liars and biggest hypocrites on the planet. They will probably
even be flattered by that description. They love being number
one, after all. Hypocrisy is like lies, in the sense that there is ordinary
hypocrisy and there is big hypocrisy. If you credibly call an American
a big-sense hypocrite they will often start spewing propaganda that celebrates
ordinary, everyday hypocrisy like not telling someone their new haircut looks
bad. Americans want to be both peepers and prudes, they want to rig
the game and call it free enterprise, and they want to be known for freedom
and liberty regardless of any domestic atrocities they commit. You can
never un-torture someone.
people are capable of outrage there will be far fewer outrages.
How dare those pigs do that to anybody.
If it's not
useful or enjoyable or necessary, it's a worthless thought.
Zap it out of existence with IFT and think something else.
self-mind control is a good thing;
external nonconsensual mind control is Mengele-like torture.
No nens follow
from nonconsensual externals,
except perhaps one to put it in the trash can
or a few to analyze it for evidence, nature
But think anything you want. I curse the pigshit Nazis sometimes.
Focus your anger.
Ah, how sad
it is, Auschwitz in the springtime...
You will feel stronger some days, fatigued others
If this essay helps you, read it again when you need a reminder.
The Nazi harassment never reflects on you.
Part I - Motives for Mind Control | Part II - Resisting the Mind Control State | Part III - Mental Firewalls